Examining COVID-19’s Disruptive Effect on Education in Mexican Universities

Daniel Prudencio  ·  Jose Roberto Balmori de la Miyar  ·  Adan Silverio-Murillo  ·  Fernanda Sobrino
International Journal of Educational Development, 2024  ·  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2024.103144

Motivation

The COVID-19 pandemic forced universities worldwide to shut down campuses, move to remote instruction, and operate under conditions of profound economic and social disruption. In developing countries, where technological infrastructure is limited and students from lower-income backgrounds face significant barriers, these disruptions were expected to be especially severe.

This paper asks a precise question: by how much did the pandemic reduce new entry, enrollment, and graduation at Mexican universities, and did the impact fall equally across all types of institutions, all fields of study, and both genders?

Using administrative records from every university in Mexico, covering academic years 2017-2018 through 2020-2021, the paper provides the first causal estimates of the pandemic’s effect on higher education in a developing country at national scale. The results reveal that graduation was hit hardest, new entry declined sharply, and the impact varied substantially by field, institution type, and student gender.


Key Findings

New entry
−16%
Fewer students enrolled as first-year students during the pandemic years, relative to the pre-pandemic baseline of 83 students per program.
Graduation
−22%
The largest of the three effects. Graduation fell by over one-fifth, driven partly by delayed completion and administrative paperwork backlogs.
Education majors
−25%
Education-related programs suffered the steepest new-entry decline of any field, raising a concern about future shortages in the teaching workforce.

The Counterintuitive Result

Elite universities (top-20 by QS ranking) gained new students relative to non-elite institutions during the pandemic. Rather than suffering equally, top-20 universities experienced a positive differential effect on new entry and enrollment. This suggests students shifted preferences toward institutions perceived as better equipped to handle the crisis, consistent with the broader finding that lower-income students bore disproportionate costs.


Study at a Glance

Feature Detail
Country Mexico
Period Academic years 2017-2018 to 2020-2021
Institutions All universities in Mexico
Observations 50,670 (university × area of study × year)
Data source ANUIES (National Association of Universities and Higher Education Institutions)
Outcomes New entry, enrollment, graduation
Areas of study 10 (sciences, engineering, health, IT, social sciences, education, business, arts & humanities, agronomy & veterinary, services)
Methods Difference-in-differences (DiD) and difference-in-differences-in-differences (DDD)
Pre-pandemic new entry mean 83.2 students per program

How to Navigate This Site